Is Someone Trying to Pull a Fast One?
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting has been amended to include both the original resolution from Judiciary as well as the amended resolution from Supervisor Schaidler.
This seems pretty fishy to me.
The agenda notes that the original resolution was "laid over from June 14, Board Meeting."
However, if you look at the Agenda from June 14th, we voted on:
Which is the amended resolution, not the original one. In fact, when calling for the vote, Chair Albrecht mentioned several times that it was the amended resolution we were voting on.
I suspect someone does not have their ducks in a row and are trying to cover their butt....
This seems pretty fishy to me.
The agenda notes that the original resolution was "laid over from June 14, Board Meeting."
However, if you look at the Agenda from June 14th, we voted on:
MOTION TO RECONSIDER RESOLUTION NO. 29-52006:
Authorize Acceptance of a Grant of $294,000 for the Purchase of 49 NewVoting Machines for County and Municipal Use and Appropriate Funds to Capital Outlay Account in the County Clerkâs 2006 Budget for that Purpose
Submittedby:
JOHN SCHAIDLER, DISTRICT28 COUNTY BOARD SUPERVISOR
Which is the amended resolution, not the original one. In fact, when calling for the vote, Chair Albrecht mentioned several times that it was the amended resolution we were voting on.
I suspect someone does not have their ducks in a row and are trying to cover their butt....
posted by Jef Hall at 7:53 AM
2 Comments:
Have you heard why there are 2 similar resolutions?
Good luck with your fight tonight!
Post a Comment
<< Home